Greenpeace wants to Protect Urban Development...
Environmentalists are urgently calling for early warning systems and infrastructure improvements in vulnerable Asian coastal regions to save people from the worst effects of future tidal waves like that of Sunday.
OK - help me out here. We have a goup - Greenpeace - which is ostensibly dedicated to preserving the environment from the perils of human activity.
On the other hand, we have a completely natural earthly (albeit tragic) event.
Where would you expect Greenpeace to end up? Ready? "Steve Sawyer, Climate Director of Greenpeace International in Amsterdam, said a warning system like that already operating in the Pacific would give threatened areas time to react in an emergency.
It would provide "a substantial number of minutes and lessen the loss of life if not the loss of property."
So - it's OK to protect the environment as long as it doesn't impact on urban development? Or is it OK to build heavily polluting urban environments as long as proper safeguards are in place to protect them from the perils of nature?
Am I the only one seeing the hypocrisy here?





