This stings.
The beauty of most "anti GM/anti Monsanto" stories is that Monsanto could always claim some version of the moral high ground. They weren't the guilty ones, so to speak.
Unless they were accused of
bribing officials to avoid an environmental assessment. Now, in fairness to Monsanto, they have also also agreed to three years' close monitoring of its business practices by American authorities, and admit and accept full responsibility for what it called improper activities.
It's often been said that for every step forward, you take two steps back. I don't know if that's necessarily true sometimes, but I do know you can't afford to willingly LEAP backwards... and unfortunately, I fear that's what Monsanto has been doing in terms of public credibility. What's especially tragic is if this is the action of a rogue employee - it simply won't matter in terms of public opinion and credibility.
This is a crystal clear example of the need to establish credibility before trouble hits, not try to rebuild after.